Page v. Danforth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding doctor’s hearsay identification of abuser was prejudicial error
• extending such reasoning when the case only largely depends upon the victim’s credibility
• “KRE 703(b) does allow evidence not otherwise admissible to come in ‘[i]f determined to be trustworthy, necessary to illuminate testimony, and unprivileged,’ to explain the basis of an expert's opinion.”
• “Generally, in a child sex abuse case, only those statements that relate to the patient's physical injuries and what caused them are pertinent to treatment and diagnosis under KRE 803(4).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).