Page v. Board of Supervisors

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “judicial estoppel . . . is designed to protect the integrity of the judicial process by prohibiting parties from playing ‘fast and loose’ with the courts” (citation and punctuation omitted)
• noting that “judicial estoppel . . . is designed to protect the integrity of the judicial process by prohibiting parties from playing ‘fast and loose’ with the courts” (citation and punctuation omitted)
• “standing is in essence the question of. . . whether the litigant is entitled to have the court decide the merits of the dispute or of particular issues, and litigants must establish their standing to raise issues before they are entitled to have a court adjudicate those issues”
• “standing is in essence the question of . . . whether the litigant is entitled to have the court decide the merits of the dispute or of particular issues, and litigants must establish their standing to raise issues before they are entitled to have a court adjudicate those issues”
• unless objected to by opposing counsel or the court, an attorney’s statement in place will be accepted as true without further evidence or confirmation
• At trial, statements in the intervenors’ pleadings coupled with a verification were insufficient to establish a contested issue of fact as to the intervenors’ standing to object to a bond validation.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).