Skip to main content
· 3/31/1993

Pagano v. Rand Materials Handling Equipment Co.

Citations

  • 621 N.E.2d 26
  • 249 Ill. App. 3d 995
  • 190 Ill. Dec. 157
  • 1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 443

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Having failed to file a timely appeal, plaintiff cannot now [challenge the propriety of earlier final orders] under the guise of a challenge to the nunc pro tunc amendment to” one of those orders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.