Paganini v. 40 W. 127th St., LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a plaintiff may only recover on an implied warranty claim “if he can establish that some item traced to a specific defendant caused his injury”
• affirming summary judgment on breach of warranty and negligence claims given the plaintiffs failure to identify manufacturer of hockey stick
• plaintiff must \establish that some item traced to a specific defendant caused his injury\ in order to recover on claims of negligence or breach of implied warranties
• plaintiff must “establish that some item traced to a specific defendant caused his injury” in order to recover on claims of negligence or breach of implied warranties
• plaintiff must “establish that some item traced to a specific defendant caused his injury” in order to recover on claims of negligence or breach of implied warranties
• “Even assuming in the plaintiffs favor that the [floor hockey] game — the concept and instructions — was the ’product’ which was sold . . ., there is no legal support for imposing liability on such a ’product’ where the seller does not provide a tangible item as well as instructions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).