Pagan Velez v. Laboy Alvarado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no need to resort to local law provisions if amendment allowed under federal rule
• “In the future, we expect counsel to maintain the highest standards of integrity in all of his representations with this court. We will not treat so gingerly further lapses in his judgement.”
• “[CJounsel for Plaintiff, Jose Ramon Olmo Rodriguez, filed an opposition to the summary judgement motion which plagiarizes full pages of Ortiz v. Colon, No. 96-1153, slip op. at 2-7 (D.P.R. Feb. 11, 2000
• “In addition to the self-evident reasons for denouncing this practice, the impugnable brief was a disservice to Plaintiff, counsel’s client, and this court, as it did not fully address all the arguments raised in Defendants’ motion for summary judgement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).