Skip to main content
· 11/7/2022

Paeltz v. Paeltz

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 3964

Syllabus

The trial court dismissed Father's general objection for failure to contain any specificity, as required by Civ.R. 53. Because he failed to contest that finding on appeal, this court's review is limited to plain error. The trial court did not err by ordering Father to pay his children's expenses where the record shows that Father is well-compensated and has a zero child support order.

Judges: Piper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.