Paehler v. Union Planters National Bank, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that parties who proceed pro se “are not excused from complying with applicable substantive and procedural law . . .”
• recognizing that this Court has the discretion to suspend or relax some of the rules of appellate procedure for good cause in order to afford parties a hearing on the merits
• deciding the appeal on the merits despite acknowledging that the appellant failed to comply with Rule 27
• deciding the appeal on the merits despite acknowledging that the appellant failed to comply with Rule 27
• deciding the appeal on the merits despite acknowledging that the appellant failed to comply with Rule 27
• “Parties who ch oose to represent themse lves . . . are not excused from comp lying with app licable substantive and procedural law. . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).