Skip to main content
· 2/8/1993

Paegle v. Department of the Interior

Citations

  • 813 F. Supp. 61
  • 1 Am. Disabilities Dec. 602
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1307
  • 61 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,209
  • 1993 WL 33371

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a back injury and de gen erative disc syndrom e is no t a handicap
  • “Since the Rehabilitation Act draws from the procedures of Title VII, the only proper defendant is the head of the department, agency or unit.” (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)
  • temporary back injury of approximately eight months not handicap for purposes of Rehabilitation Act
  • “[W]hen a federal employee seeks to redress rights guaranteed by the Rehabilitation Act, that Act preempts other actions to redress the same discrimination. (citing Shirey v. Devine, 670 F.2d 1188, 1191 n.7 (D.C. Cir. 1982))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John H. Pratt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.