Paducah Grain & Elevator Co. v. Marshall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that even if the court were inclined to allow vouching, the removing defendant’s averment that the other defendants “did not object” to removal was insufficient to indicate that they affirmatively consented to removal
• stating that “defendants must communicate their consent to removal to the court”
• “Defendants must also establish that all pertinent procedural requirements for removal have been met.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).