Paducah Cooperage Co. v. Paducah Veneer Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an anti-assignment clause in a procurement agreement was rendered ineffective under New York’s version of the U.C.C.
• “where there is a valid and enforceable contract between the parties, and the subject matter of the unjust enrichment claim is covered by the contract, the unjust enrichment claim must be dismissed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).