Padre Shipping, Inc. v. Yong He Shipping

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant had an attachable interest in funds that it was allegedly holding as agent for third-party owners, where the funds had been intentionally directed to or from the defendant’s account by those third parties
• finding that plaintiff had made out a valid prima facie admiralty claim when it had shown that Chinese law would govern the contract and that it had a valid claim under that law
• considering evidence that plaintiff had valid claim under Chinese law, which governed the dispute
• “plaintiffs are allowed to assert inconsistent facts in support of alternative claims, and courts may not construe allegations regarding one claim to be an admission against another”
• “[P]laintiffs are allowed to assert inconsistent facts in support of alternative claims, and courts may not construe allegations regarding one claim to be an admission against another.”
• “plaintiffs are allowed to assert inconsistent facts in support of alternative claims, and courts may not construe allegations regarding one claim to be an admission against another”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).