Skip to main content
· 12/15/2004

Padot v. Padot

Citations

  • 891 So. 2d 1079
  • 2004 WL 2892072

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that changing the period of retroactivity of sums owed to former wife was not a “clerical correction under rule 1.540”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Silberman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.