Skip to main content

Padilla v. State

Citations

  • 568 P.2d 190
  • 90 N.M. 664

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that entry of a deferred sentence, even though charges are dismissed after period of probation, constitutes finding of guilt for purposes of enhancement of sentence as an habitual offender
  • reaffirming that a \conviction\ refers to a finding of guilt and does not include the imposition of a sentence
  • reaffirming that a “conviction” refers to a finding of guilt and does not include the imposition of a sentence
  • finding defendant was “convicted” for purpose of habitual offender sentencing, even though criminal charges were dismissed under deferred sentence
  • “[A] ‘conviction’ refers to a finding of guilt and does not include the imposition of a sentence.”
  • upon dismissal of the charges pursuant to a deferred sentence, there still has been a conviction since conviction refers to a finding of guilt and does not include the imposition of a sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Federici, Sosa, Easley, Payne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.