· 10/7/2013
Padilla v. Newyork
Citations
- 134 S. Ct. 325
- 187 L. Ed. 2d 158
- 82 U.S.L.W. 3185
- 571 U.S. 889
- 2013 WL 4028369
- 2013 U.S. LEXIS 7212
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that futility, undue delay, and prejudice are grounds for not providing leave to amend
- concluding that the civil cover sheet was insufficient to allow the defendant to calculate the amount in controversy
- concluding that the civil cover sheet was insufficient to allow the defendant to calculate the amount in controversy
- holding that FCRA claims against credit reporting agencies “are not the proper vehicle for collaterally attacking the legal validity of consumer debts”
- concluding that the civil cover sheet was insufficient to allow the defendant to calculate the amount in controversy
- holding that futility is a ground for not providing leave to amend
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.