Skip to main content
· 10/1/2001

Padilla v. Cambra

Citations

  • 534 U.S. 844
  • 122 S. Ct. 105

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where statute makes clear no enforceable right or benefit created, no one can satisfy the zone of interests test to challenge the administrative action
  • vagueness claim reviewed for plain error
  • vagueness claim reviewed for plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.