Padilla v. Brawn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding exercise of personal jurisdiction against nonresident former employees under § 302(a)(2
• nexus requirement satisfied, in plaintiff’s contract and misappropriation action, where contracts were executed and other business activities were transacted in New York
• “Simply put, the appellants could not conduct any business for Wise, in New York or elsewhere, without the confidential information they allegedly misappropriated.”
• nexus requirement satisfied, in plaintiff's contract and misappropriation action, where contracts were executed and other business activities were transacted in New York
• defendants’ “access via computer to data . . . maintained in New York” supported a finding of personal jurisdiction
• “Mani festly, [due process concerns regarding minimum contacts are] not present where, as here, a defendant has purposefully directed its activities toward the forum, and has created continuing obligations between itself and forum residents”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).