Padilla v. Archer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• listing, as examples of “traditional and necessary state function[s],” “those functions performed by the state police, our public schools, the corrections system, and public highways and airways.” (emphasis added)
• listing, as examples of “traditional and necessary state function[s],” “those functions performed by the state police, our public schools, the corrections system, and public highways and airways.” (emphasis added)
• denying immunity to a sanitation district formed by communities in northern Kentucky because the district was not an arm or alter ego of the counties exercising substantial control over the district nor did it perform a function critical to Kentucky’s infrastructure
• “The people of Kentucky, through § 230 of the Kentucky Constitution, have invested in the General Assembly with the legislative power to appropriate funds from the public purse.”
• “[N]ot every ‘public purpose’ qualifies as an ‘integral state function.’ ”
• “[N]ot every ‘public purpose’ qualifies as an ‘integral state function.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).