Skip to main content
· 12/4/2002

Padilla Ex Rel. Newman v. Bush

Citations

  • 233 F. Supp. 2d 564
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23086
  • 2002 WL 31718308

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in analyzing the AUMF, finding that there is “no relevant constitutional difference between a bill and a joint resolution”
  • Court discusses legal consequences of President designating plaintiff an “enemy combatant.”
  • location of counsel a factor to consider

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mukasey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.