· 1/9/2013
Padieu, Philippe, Relator v. Court of Appeals of Texas, 5th District
Citations
- 392 S.W.3d 115
- 2013 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 487
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction when an article 11.07 application is pending
- instructing that the Texas Court of 1 Criminal Appeals possesses sole authority to grant relief in a post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding filed in state court
- distinguishing the intermediate appellate court’s authority to order mandamus relief in a case where an article 11.07 application is anticipated but not filed from cases involving active habeas corpus proceedings concerning final felony convictions
- “It is well established that only the Court of Criminal Appeals possesses the authority to grant relief in a post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding where there is a final felony conviction.”
- “Although the records he seeks may be intended for preparation of an eventual habeas corpus application, the issue here is simply whether the trial judge has a duty to act upon his pending motion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.