Skip to main content
· 1/9/2013

Padieu, Philippe, Relator v. Court of Appeals of Texas, 5th District

Citations

  • 392 S.W.3d 115
  • 2013 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 487

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indicating that the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction when an article 11.07 application is pending
  • instructing that the Texas Court of 1 Criminal Appeals possesses sole authority to grant relief in a post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding filed in state court
  • distinguishing the intermediate appellate court’s authority to order mandamus relief in a case where an article 11.07 application is anticipated but not filed from cases involving active habeas corpus proceedings concerning final felony convictions
  • “It is well established that only the Court of Criminal Appeals possesses the authority to grant relief in a post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding where there is a final felony conviction.”
  • “Although the records he seeks may be intended for preparation of an eventual habeas corpus application, the issue here is simply whether the trial judge has a duty to act upon his pending motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.