Skip to main content
· 9/5/1989

Padco, Inc. v. Kinney & Lange

Citations

  • 444 N.W.2d 889
  • 1989 Minn. App. LEXIS 966
  • 1989 WL 100539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a complaint alleging the elements of a legal malpractice claim sufficiently alleged the elements of a breach-of-fiduciary-duty claim
  • holding that a complaint alleging the elements of a legal-malpractice claim sufficiently alleged the elements of a breach-of- fiduciary-duty claim
  • recognizing that negligence and breach-of-fiduciary-duty claims involve the same elements
  • stating that elements of a breach-of-fiduciary-duty claim are the same as the elements of a negligence claim
  • recognizing that negligence and breach-of-fiduciary-duty claims involve the same elements
  • affirming grant of summary judgment on legal malpractice claim because plaintiff failed to provide evidence sufficient to establish two elements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: A. Paul Lommen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.