Pacini v. Regopoulos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, because a 94.9953% occupancy rate was essentially a 95% occupancy rate, the difference was de minimis and there was no breach
• finding no breach of an occupancy guarantee because 94.9953% occupancy rate was tantamount to a 95% occupancy rate
• applying the doctrine to a shopping center sale contract where 95% occupancy was required and 94.9953% was achieved
• finding that the court must enforce an agreement as written
• finding that the court must enforce an agreement as written
• finding no breach of an occupancy guarantee because 94.9953% occupancy rate was tanta- mount to a 95% occupancy rate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).