PACIFIC UNION CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS Et Al. v. MARSHALL Et Al.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The policy against piecemeal interlocutory review other than as provided for by statutorily authorized appeals is a strong one.” (citations omitted)
• “The policy against piecemeal interlocutory review other than as provided for by statutorily authorized appeals is a strong one.”
• denying mandamus of discovery order where attorney claimed work-product privilege
• an order denying summary judgment is not a “final order or decision” under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, therefore it is not appealable; it is reviewable only pursuant to the provisions for interlocutory appeal set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)
• order denying summary judgment not final

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).