Skip to main content
· 9/1/1891

Pacific Rolling Mill Co. v. Riverside & Arlington Railway Co.

Citations

  • 90 Cal. 627
  • 27 P. 525
  • 1891 Cal. LEXIS 979

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[w]hen the state refunds money for overpayment of taxes” to taxpayer claiming private school tax credits, state is not remitting public funds but is “returning the taxpayer’s own money”
  • “Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy to compel a public officer to perform a required duty when there is no other adequate legal remedy.”
  • “OCGA § 9-6-24 does not grant standing to challenge the validity of a public duty authorized by statute, and therefore to attack the constitutionality of the statute.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Yanclief

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.