Skip to main content
· 12/8/1900

Pacific National Bank v. San Francisco Bridge Co.

Citations

  • 23 Wash. 425
  • 63 P. 207
  • 1900 Wash. LEXIS 372

Syllabus

<p>EVIDENCE-VARYING ESCROW AGREEMENT-ADMISSIBILITY OE PAROL.</p> <p>Where a written agreement of escrow is neither ambiguous nor uncertain, but is sufficient to show the intent of the parties and a complete agreement in itself, parol evidence of a verbal contemporaneous agreement whose effect would be to modify and vary its terms is inadmissible, even if the evidence tends to prove an independent, collateral agreement, if such oral contract would entirely change the scope and meaning of the writing.</p> <p>SALES-TIME AND PLACE OE DELIVERY.</p> <p>Where goods are sold without any place of delivery being agreed upon a tender of delivery at the place where the goods are when sold is sufficient, but to be effective must be made within a reasonable time.</p>

Judges: Fullerton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.