Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Ernst & Young & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “For purposes of this opinion, we assume, without deciding, that such a claim [for aiding and abetting] may be asserted in Texas, but our decision should not be construed as a holding that such a claim exists in Texas separate and apart from a conspiracy claim.”
• to the extent that duty may be considered a part of the scienter element of a fraud claim, such duty extends to all persons the fraud defendant intends or has reason to expect will rely on its misrepresentations (citing RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS § 531)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).