Pacific Mut. Life Ins. v. Cunningham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “stigma” of jurisdictional judgment, together with “taint” on parent’s record with the Department of Human Services, is a collateral consequence that renders the dispute justiciable
• applying that standard of review to a juvenile dependency judgment where the court declined to exercise de novo review under ORS 19.415
• applying that standard of review to a juvenile dependency judgment where the court declined to exercise de novo review under ORS 19.415
• stating that proponents must prove “that there is a current risk of harm and not simply that the child’s welfare was endangered at some point in the past” (emphasis in original)
• declining to decide, in juvenile dependency case involving physical violence, threats, breaking objects, and verbal abuse, whether verbal abuse ‘standing alone’ would create jurisdiction
• declining to decide, in juvenile dependency case involving physical violence, threats, breaking objects, and verbal abuse, whether verbal abuse \standing alone\ would create jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).