Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of California v. Andrews

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The relevant secondary consideration is ‘long-felt but unsolved need,’ not long-felt need in isolation.” (emphasis in original)
• “Although this court has noted the relevance of contemporaneous independent invention to the level of ordinary knowledge or skill in the art, it has also acknowledged the view that this evidence is relevant as a secondary consideration”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).