Pacific Landmark Hotel, Ltd. v. Marriott Hotels, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• an “employee who continues in the employ of the employer after 20 the employer has given notice of changed terms or conditions of employment has accepted the 21 changed terms and condition.”
• \The trial court was disregarding the separate corporate entities . . . when it found MHI had an interest in the subject of the agency. . . . The trial court erred in failing to treat MHI as separate from its parent corporation Marriott.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).