Pacific Insurance Co., Ltd. v. Oregon Auto. Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he phrase ‘for any purpose’ in [RLH 1955 § 160—10(e) ] is not all-encompassing, but is restricted to a reasonable construction by [the] context of the entire statute and the purposes of the act”
• departure from express language permitted to avoid absurd and unjust result and is clearly inconsistent with purpose of the Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).