Skip to main content
· 4/30/2003

Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd. v. Eaton Vance Management

Citations

  • 260 F. Supp. 2d 334
  • 30 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1590
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7512
  • 2003 WL 1989584

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A federal district court sitting in Massachusetts and presiding over a diversity action should apply Massachusetts law in calculating prejudgment interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tauro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.