Skip to main content
· 12/30/1991

Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Golden

Citations

  • 791 F. Supp. 935
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20490
  • 1991 WL 333925

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • restating the standard as: “ ‘the materiality requirement is satisfied if the false statement concerns a subject relevant and germane to the insurer’s investigation as it was then proceeding’ ” (quoting Fine v. Bellefonte Underwriters Ins. Co., 725 F.2d 179, 183 (2nd Cir.
  • “the materiality requirement is satisfied if the false statement concerns a subject relevant and germane to the insurer’s investigation as it was then proceeding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eginton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.