· 12/30/1991
Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Golden
Citations
- 791 F. Supp. 935
- 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20490
- 1991 WL 333925
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- restating the standard as: “ ‘the materiality requirement is satisfied if the false statement concerns a subject relevant and germane to the insurer’s investigation as it was then proceeding’ ” (quoting Fine v. Bellefonte Underwriters Ins. Co., 725 F.2d 179, 183 (2nd Cir.
- “the materiality requirement is satisfied if the false statement concerns a subject relevant and germane to the insurer’s investigation as it was then proceeding”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eginton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.