Skip to main content
· 5/7/1987

Pacific Fruit Express v. Industrial Commission

Citations

  • 735 P.2d 820
  • 153 Ariz. 210
  • 1987 Ariz. LEXIS 244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming a finding of timeliness when the ALJ identified the precise medical test after which the claimant knew or should have known his hearing loss was a compensable injury
  • defining compensation claim for purposes of accrual of statute of limitations
  • “We do not weigh the evidence, but consider it in the light most favorable for sustaining the award.”
  • “We do not weigh the evidence, but consider it in the light most favorable for sustaining the award.”
  • claimant has burden of proving circumstances excusing failure to report forthwith injury to employer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon, Feldman, Holohan, Cameron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.