Pacific Fisheries Inc. v. United States of America, Konstantin Vladimirovich Voloshenko v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a petition to quash is moot when a 49 || summons has been withdrawn
• holding that the 19 petitions were moot once the summons were withdrawn
• noting that the government “acted reasonably when it asked the taxpayers to voluntarily dismiss the petitions to quash, given that those petitions were moot after the summonses were withdrawn”
• \[T]he purpose of discovery is to aid a party in the preparation of its case ....\
• “[T]he purpose of 12 discovery is to aid a party in the preparation of its case . . . .”
• “[T]he purpose of discovery is to aid a party in the preparation of its case . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).