Skip to main content
· 8/25/2004

Pacific Decision Sciences Corp. v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 18 Cal. Rptr. 3d 104
  • 121 Cal. App. 4th 1100
  • 2004 Daily Journal DAR 10596
  • 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7868
  • 2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1408

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the location of the debtor or 23 obligor “is considered the location of the intangible property plaintiff seeks to reach”
  • “[A] California court lacks jurisdiction to 27 command a sheriff, marshal, or constable in Florida or New Jersey to levy a California 28 writ of attachment on a New Jersey company or a Florida bank.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ikola

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.