Pacific Decision Sciences Corp. v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the location of the debtor or 23 obligor “is considered the location of the intangible property plaintiff seeks to reach”
• “[A] California court lacks jurisdiction to 27 command a sheriff, marshal, or constable in Florida or New Jersey to levy a California 28 writ of attachment on a New Jersey company or a Florida bank.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Aequitas Enters., LLC v. Interstate Investment Group, LLC
  Utah Supreme Court· 2011-12-28· cited 18×
• PALACIO DEL MAR HOMEOWNERS ASSN., INC. v. McMahon
  California Court of Appeal· 2009-06-16· cited 8×
• Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc. v. Metric & Inch Tools, Inc.
  C.D. California· 2009-04-08· cited 2×
• Bagby v. Davis
  California Court of Appeal· 2026-02-17

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Marriage of Brown
  California Supreme Court· 1976-01-16· cited 507×
• Waite v. Waite
  California Supreme Court· 1972-01-14· cited 88×
• Thayer Plymouth Center, Inc. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 1967-10-23· cited 27×
• Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Leet
  California Supreme Court· 1944-02-10· cited 26×
• Estate of Waits
  California Supreme Court· 1944-02-10· cited 23×
• Epstein v. Abrams
  California Court of Appeal· 1997-09-23· cited 16×