Pacific Concrete Federal Credit Union v. Kauanoe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the requirements of HRCP Rule 56(e) “are mandatory” and that “[bjecause [a] ledger had not been attached to the affidavit Lthat relied upon the ledger], any information therefrom was inadmissible and should not have been considered by the circuit court”
• noting that consumers are typically unaware of their rights under TILA until a creditor files suit to collect on the outstanding loan
• holding that the requirements of HRCP Rule 56(e
• holding that the requirements of HRCP Rule 56(e
• “[HRCP Rule 56(e) ] requires that facts set forth in the affidavits be admissible in evidence. All papers referred to in the affidavits must also be attached and sworn to or certified.”
• reference to a ledger, without 13 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER authenticated supporting materials, is insufficient to establish payments made, and therefore, summary judgment was improper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).