Pacific Coast Co. v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “the common question of law satisfies the ‘predominance’ requirement ... because the cause of action challenges a system-wide failure”
• discussing Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156, 177-78, 94 S.Ct. 2140, 40 L.Ed.2d 732 (1974) (interpreting Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 23)
• noting in a case about calculating compensation for additional time worked, that “there is little benefit to having each proposed class member retain counsel, pay filing fees, and submit duplicative pleadings”
• certifying a class action when plaintiffs were dispersed throughout twelve states
• certifying a class action when Plaintiffs were dispersed throughout twelve states
• “The party moving for class certification bears the burden of satisfying the requirements set forth in RCFC 23 by a preponderance of the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).