Pacific Bldg. Corp. v. County of Maui

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Board must account for and provide reasons for its rejection of material evidence favorable to the claimant
• holding that the credibility of lay evidence generally can be assessed by a showing of interest, bias, or inconsistent statements
• holding that in weighing credibility, VA may consider inconsistent statements, internal inconsistency, and consistency with other evidence of record
• holding that credibility can be impeached generally by a showing of interest, bias, inconsistent statements, or, to a certain extent, bad character
• holding that a showing of interest, bias, and inconsistent statements generally are the factors used to evaluate credibility
• recognizing that \[a] service connection claim must be accompanied by evidence which establishes that the claimant currently has the claimed disability\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).