Pace Ex Rel. Pace v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a federal statute did not impose a statutory duty of care on the defendant, where the petitioner “could not ‘identify ... specific words and phrases in the [statute] that ... obligated the ... State defendants to take some specific action”
• concluding that a federal statute did not impose a statutory duty of care on the defendant, where the petitioner “could not ‘identify . . . specific words and phrases in the [statute] - 11 - that . . . obligated the . . . State defendants to take some specific action”
• affirming circuit court’s grant of motion to dismiss negligence action against the State based on an alleged duty owed to a public school student to ensure she received a school lunch that met her specific dietary needs
• Department of Education and state Superintendent of Schools

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).