Skip to main content
· 5/18/1992

Paccom Leasing Corp. v. Deico Electronics, Inc. (In Re Deico Electronics, Inc.)

Citations

  • 139 B.R. 945
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4630
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 7441
  • 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 744
  • 23 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 7
  • 1992 WL 114484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • awarding loss of claim value from the date that creditor would have been able to obtain the property in the absence of the automatic stay
  • “[Ajdequate protection analysis requires the bankruptcy court to first determine when the creditor would have obtained its state law remedies had bankruptcy not intervened.”
  • adequate protection analysis requires the court to first determine when the creditor would have obtained its state law remedies had bankruptcy not intervened, and determine the value of the collateral as of that date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ollason, Ashland, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.