Paar v. Bay Crest Ass'n

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing jury award of damages due to instruction on constructive fraud
• “instruction on conspiracy was not supported by the evidence because a corporation cannot conspire with itself and here no allegation was made that [the employee who made the alleged misrepresentations] acted outside the scope of his employment”
• automobile company’s breach of contract was the tort of negligent performance of duties arising by contract, and there was no showing that the company, in addition to breaching contract to repair vehicle, had also improperly retained and “stripped” the vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).