PA Rstrnt & Lodging v. City of Pgh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because Section 11 complements the double jeopardy protections of the Oklahoma and United States Constitutions, a traditional double jeopardy analysis is conducted only if Section 11 does not apply
• “[E]ven though we review for plain error, rather than [preserved] error, the harmless error doctrine of the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S. Ct. 824, 17 L. Ed. 2d 705 (1967
• legislative intent is key to double-punishment analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).