Skip to main content
· 10/12/2023

P.A. & a.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding where district court failed to discuss evidence of “bad faith” and advising court to “closely scrutinize self-serving” evidence
  • noting that this factual finding is “conclusive on remand”
  • examining whether payments to union officers were authorized by the union’s constitution
  • \The officers had a direct financial incentive\ to substantiate expenses because \each officer could easily have avoided a substantial additional tax liability by keeping and submitting receipts for legitimate union-related expenses he or she incurred each month.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.