P. X. Restaurant, Inc. v. Town of Windsor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• intended scope of statutory provision is determined by the harm \it was designed to remedy and the policy underlying it\
• “[t]he party or his privy against whom collateral estoppel is asserted . . . must have been given a full and fair opportunity to litigate in a prior proceeding the issue sought to be precluded in the subsequent proceeding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).