P. Schoenfeld Asset Management LLC v. Cendant Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a mere “disagreement with the Court’s decision” will not suffice for reconsideration
• holding a mere “disagreement with the Court’s decision” will not suffice for reconsideration
• explaining a motion for reconsideration “may not be used to re-litigate old matters”
• “A party seeking reconsideration must show more than a disagreement with the Court’s decision... .”
• A motion for reconsideration “may not be used to relitigate old matters.”
• A motion for reconsideration “may not be used to relitigate old matters.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).