P & P MARKETING, INC. v. Ditton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Rule 9(b) pleading requirements are relaxed “where the defendants are corporate insiders or control the actions of an entity”
• “Rule 9(b) requirements should not be interpreted to require a pleading to go beyond the specifics of a fraudulent scheme and demonstrate compliance with Rule 11 investigation requirements.”
• “It is consistently alleged that both ■ defendants caused [their corporations] to undertake the various actions involved in the ... incidents. Defendants are in a better position than plaintiff to know which of them or other employees ... actually performed the specific acts alleged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).