P & L Contractors, Inc. v. American Norit Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the IJ acted within her discretion in 6 according [letters] little weight because the declarants (particularly [petitioner]’s 7 wife) were interested parties and neither was available for cross-examination”
• interpreting special interrogatories to reverse and render judgment on quantum meruit recovery
• a court is “bound to enter judgment on the jury’s answers [to special interrogatories] if they are clear and consistent”
• to succeed on claim for infringer’s profits, “a plaintiff is first required to prove the defendants’ gross revenues over the course of the relevant time period, and then to establish a causal nexus between the infringement and the profits sought”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).