P., JONATHAN L., MTR. OF

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the law at the time of the 1997-98 investigation [of the Daly Murder] clearly established that police officers investigating a criminal case were required to disclose material, impeachment evidence to the defense”
• noting that as of 1978, “police investigators violate Brady when they fail to disclose material impeachment evidence to prosecutors”
• re-affirming that law enforcement officers have a Brady duty to disclose material impeachment evidence to prosecutors
• re-affirming that law enforcement officers have a Brady duty to disclose material impeachment evidence to prosecutors
• finding that because the officer defendant “had participated in hundreds of homicide investigations,” a reasonable jury “could conclude that [the officer] knowingly suppressed the statements to secure a conviction”
• finding that because the officer defendant “had participated in hundreds of homicide investigations,” a reasonable jury “could conclude that [the officer] knowingly suppressed the statements to secure a conviction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).