P., CHARLES, MTR. OF

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we are not bound by the label the district court places on its disposition
• noting that a plaintiff may seek \prospective relief against ongoing or imminent First Amendment violations\ (emphasis added)
• noting that a plaintiff may seek prospective relief against a defendant’s “ongoing or imminent” conduct
• reasoning that a threatened administrative inquiry could confer standing if it “imposes some significant burden, independent of any ultimate sanction”
• noting that we may “treat the district court’s entry of summary judgment . . . as a dismissal under Rule 12(b)(1) for want of jurisdiction, and affirm on that basis”
• showing prior enforcement of a statute can raise the inference of future enforcement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).