P & B Packers, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “in the absence of some unusual set of facts that would suffice to differentiate the relationship [at issue] from other employer- employee relationships, [an employee does] not have a fiduciary [duty]”
• finding no breach of fiduciary duty because “any confidence that Plaintiff reposed in [employee] consisted of nothing more than relying on him to competently perform his assigned duties”
• finding no breach of fiduciary duty because “any confidence that Plaintiff reposed in [employee] consisted of nothing more than relying on him to competently perform his assigned duties”
• finding no breach of fiduciary duty because “any confidence that AAF reposed in [employee] consisted of nothing more than relying on him to competently perform his assigned duties”
• finding no breach of fiduciary duty because “any confidence that Plaintiff reposed in [employee] consisted of nothing more than relying on him to competently perform his assigned duties”
• no breach of fiduciary duty because “any confidence that Plaintiff reposed in [employee] consisted of nothing more than relying on him to competently perform his assigned duties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).