Ozarks Electric Cooperative Corp. v. Harrelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff in medical malpractice action could not introduce testimony of a chiropractor against a physical 6 therapist because the two professions are listed separately under OCGA § 9-11-9.1 (g)
• finding the two professions are listed separately under OCGA § 9-11-9.1(g)
• chiropractor experienced in performing electrostimulation therapy not qualified to testify on standard of care for physical therapist performing same therapy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).